Javier Marti vs Renta Tokuda Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W W W W L
Form
W L W W L W W W L LHead To Head: Marti 1 - 0 Tokuda
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marti winning 2 and Tokuda winning 0. The last match between Marti and Tokuda was at the Turkey F32 (Antalya), 03-09-2017, Final, Clay with Javier Marti getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Javier Marti | 1 |
| Renta Tokuda | 0 |
Turkey F32 (Antalya)(03-09-2017)
7
6
6
2
| Marti | Stats | Tokuda |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (13-7) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 842 | Ranking | 857 |
| 170 | Highest Rank | 289 |
| 33 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 19 | Titles | 10 |
| 64% (372-211) | Career Total W/L | 61% (265-170) |
| $63,425 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Javier Marti
Player
Renta Tokuda
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:6:0 | Average Match Time | 2:6:0 |
| 54% (38/70) | 1st Serve % | 54% (37/69) |
| 58% (22/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (27/37) |
| 66% (21/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (12/32) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 43% (30/69) | Return Points Win % | 39% (27/70) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Javier Marti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Javier Marti
45%
(
37 of
83)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
5
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Javier Marti
Player
Akira Santillan
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
83)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
8
50%
(
27 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Javier Marti
Player
Abedallah Shelbayh
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Javier Marti
Player
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
66%
(
67 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
69 of
96)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
47 of
69)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
103
Total Points Won
95
|
6-2 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Javier Marti
Player
Fabrizio Ornago
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Marti
Player
Juan Pablo Paz
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Renta Tokuda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Renta Tokuda
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tsung-Hao Huang
Player
Renta Tokuda
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
78%
(
49 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(7) 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Yuta Tomida
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
49%
(
21 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
62%
(
58 of
94)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
42 of
60)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Duckhee Lee
Player
Renta Tokuda
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Yeongseok Jeong
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Renta Tokuda
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Renta Tokuda
Player
Rio Noguchi
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (372/211) | Win/Loss | 61% (265/170) |
| 61% (821/525) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (581/394) |
| 55% (6762/5509) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4816/4055) |
| 53% (31/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 61% (197/124) |
| 66% (332/169) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (43/24) |
| 29% (4/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (25/22) |
| 50% (5/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 393 | Aces Total | 749 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 659 | Total Double Faults | 652 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:16:21 |
| 138.98 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.72 |
| 65% (12611/19372) | 1st Serve % | 66% (14757/22479) |
| 64% (8072/12611) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9771/14757) |
| 50% (3380/6761) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (4087/7732) |
| 48% (1092/2277) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1147/2502) |
| 44% (8591/19444) | Return Points Win % | 42% (9722/23263) |
| 61% (11/7) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (18/22) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (80/74) | Challenger W/L | 41% (39/55) |
| 72% (263/104) | Futures W/L | 67% (226/113) |
| 64% (365/569) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (261/421) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 59% (75/128) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (40/81) |
| 56% (103/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (62/114) |
| 87% (371/323) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (257/226) |
| 12% (371/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (257/29) |
| 22% (211/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (177/37) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
